A common problem. I've often seen it mentioned in collections of trivia and cool facts that monkeys and apes open their bananas from the "bottom", often accompanied by a suggestion for us to do the same. Following a recent reminder by a fellow named Mahdroo, I started doing just that! It has proved to be far superior to the traditional human choice.

As you can see on in the image to the left, a banana has the little "tail" on top, and a small nub on the bottom. Commonly one may bend the tail backwards against the banana's natural curvature, until it tears. Then you peel the banana. But sometimes, the banana isn't quite ripe, or just extra hardy. In those cases the skin doesn't tear as easily and you mush up the top of the banana. Here's the solution:

Turn the banana upside down! Use your fingers to squeeze the nub. It should start opening in the middle as you squeeze (careful not to squeeze the flesh of the banana), then just use your other hand to peel the two (or more) sections apart! Voila! You have peeled a banana from the bottom! Feel free to discard the little part that's now at the top of your banana, though I know some folks who enjoy eating that part.

This has been a post from the Newsletter Series
After every newsletter issue I will be slowly posting selected articles from it (often with slight editing) unto my blog. If you want to get these articles in their original rapidly delivered form, sign up below:

After this week's daily news commentary experiment failed, I finally decided to get started on my newsletter!

These will be weekly emails that will my writings on all sorts of subjects. You'll get to learn about the coolest things possible, with links to further resources. Also: fabulous how-tos that will teach you various useful skills! Basically a bit like DamnInteresting.com but with a Mike K twist.

Sign up below! Other than the newsletter once a week you will never be spammed, nor will your email address be used for anything else ever, nor sold, given away, etc. It's safe with me!

Now that my copy of On Food and Cooking by Harold McGee has arrived, I decided it was time to get started exploring French cuisine. For those unfamiliar with the book it is the premier guide on why food tastes as it does when handled in particular ways. It's the science of food presented in a readable and clear way, without the flourishes of molecular gastronomy or modernist cuisine. Highly recommended!

As much as I love meat, meat products, meat flavors for health reasons I've been try to cook mostly mostly fish and vegetables.

This also poses an interesting challenge: I happen to be taste averse to a wide variety of vegetables, particularly cruciferous vegetables in their cooked state. I don't mean "I don't like them", I mean "I will vomit if I force myself to eat them". This doesn't mean I want to avoid vegetables I'm averse to entirely, but rather, I will figure out what in their chemical composition I am bothered by, and attempt to minimize it. I'm gonna up the difficulty level a bit more: I can't just drown everything in salt and butter and call it a day, that's the easy way out.

To start out, though, I wanted something relatively easy, thus: Le tourin à l'ail. This is a pretty simple garlic soup common in the south-west of France. It's pretty low in fat and since it contains egg much like egg drop soup, this lets me consume another item to which I'm taste averse.

The recipe I used can be found on Wikibooks, but I'll reproduce it here for convenience, my modifications are in italics:

Ingredients

• 10-12 cloves of garlic, chopped
• 1 tablespoon olive oil
• 1 tablespoon flour
• water — 4 cups (adjust amount as needed - use distilled, filtered or reverse osmosis water)
  • I used a diluted vegetable stock. Seasoning this water properly is the key to making this soup taste delicious.
• salt to taste
• 1 egg, separated
• pepper to taste
• 1 teaspoon vinegar

Serves 2

Procedure

1. In a frying pan, brown the chopped garlic (or optionally, an equal mixture of chopped onions and garlic) in the olive oil.
   • I used a small pot. I would recommend that or a saucepan. Looking up the recipe in French, they tend to use a "faittout", which seems to mean some sort of saucepan.
2. Add the flour.
3. Mix well, then cook for a moment.
4. Add some boiling salted water, and cook for 10 minutes.
5. In a separate dish, mix:
   • egg yolk
   • pepper
   • vinegar
6. Add the egg white to the soup, first tempering in a separate bowl with a whisk, so that no large pieces of egg white form.
   • Make sure to add it very gradually, and to use a fork in the soup itself to spread out the egg whites as you are pouring.
7. Cook another 5 minutes. Remove from heat and add the egg yolk mixture, again tempering to avoid coagulation.
8. Place thin slices of bread in each soup bowl, and pour the soup on top. Serve hot. Bon appétit.

 

It turned out quite well! The garlic which I only browned slightly turned out to have an almost potato-like texture, but without the starchiness. Soft and rich, it complemented the egg whites in provided substance to the texture. The cooked garlic also lacked the sweetness many root vegetables (such as turnips) acquire when cooked. For me, that's a plus. I'm not sure what the vinegary yolk contributed, but I'm sure it helped. The soup was redolent of garlic, but surprisingly mild, the flavor releasing only in your mouth, never overpowering.

I cannot overstate the value of properly seasoning the soup. My vegeterian girlfriend remarked that she would be afraid to order this soup at a restaurant after tasting it, it tasted so much like chicken broth. With no additions of MSG or similar umami-fortifiers, the saltiness is what provided this deepness of flavor. It's a thin boundry between "perfectly seasoned" and "oversalted" andwe must tread and carefully remain on the right side. The cowardly will be rewarded with bland and tasteless soups!

 

Not sure what I'll make next time! Ratatouille calls out to me, but I can't stand neither zucchinis nor aubergines... which makes me want to figure out a way to prepare it even more!

In one of my sailing classes, one of my shipmates was a Russian ex-navyman who served on a Delta IV class (designated "Delfin" or Dolphin in Russian) nuclear submarine. Once he realized I spoke Russian we got to chatting more about his experiences on the submarines and he told me the amusing story of the genesis of the Typhoon-class submarine (that's the NATO designation, the Russians call it "Akula"--Shark).

Those of you have watched or read The Hunt for Red October would be familiar with the Soviet-built Typhoon, it was the Red October itself. It also has a rather distinctive wide and flat appearance.

In the late 70s and early 80s, the workhorses of the Soviet nuclear sub fleet were earlier iterations of the Delta class (Delta I through III). The world was moving from liquid-fueled to solid-fueled rockets but apparently the latter take up more space that was available on the Deltas. The Americans were designing and putting out bigger subs.

When faced with this dilemma the Soviets thought about it for a while, then put two Delta class hulls next to each other, wrapped them with a shared skin, and called it a day!

P.S. This reminds me of a Soviet joke my Dad used to tell, that I'll translate here into English. It doesn't carry over all too well, but some of you may be amused at the self-deprecation:

The Americans are trying to steal the Russian MiG-29 plans.
The CIA sends a spy who manages to come back with the blueprints.
They build them only to discover they've just built a steam locomotive.
So they send a better spy who comes back with plans that he's sure are the right ones.
They build them, and find they've got another locomotive.
This time they send their best spy, and his orders are to bring back the head engineer.
Back in the US with the engineer they ask him what they were doing wrong. The engineer looks at the plans they've stolen and at the locomotive, and points at some fine print on the plans, "See? you've just forgotten to file it down!"

Pigritia, Impatientia, Superbia Bonas Est

I think I got my declensions right.

Edit: Fix in the comments has been applied, and the whole app is now on BitBucket, so download it from there: http://bitbucket.org/anateus/moviesneak.py

I'm happy to announce the release of version 0.5 of moviesneak.py, script for figuring out what movies come right after each other such that you can go from one to the next on a single ticket.

This version follows an age-old tradition of BASIC programs by prompting you for information step by step. The date, zipcode, movie theater, and movies you actually want to watch. Then it prints out a list of movie pairs (I doubt you're going to sit through more than two).

Currently a tolerance of 15 minutes is hardcoded, fairly straightforward to modify. What this mean is that if one movie starts 15 minutes before another ends, it would still recommend them as a pair, what with previews and whatnot. If the opposite is true, 15 minutes is not too suspicious a time to loiter about :>

The code is distributed under a BSD license. It requires BeautifulSoup which I've included in my distribution, so you just need Python!

Happy sneaking! Don't get caught :)

 

Download here:

moviesneak-0.5.zip

In Washington there isn't any plan
With "feeding David" on page sixty-four;
It must be accidental that the milk man
Leaves a bottle at my door.

It must be accidental that the butcher
Has carcasses arriving at his shop
The very place where, when I need some meat,
I accidentally stop.

My life is chaos turned miraculous;
I speak a word and people understand
Although it must be gibberish since words
Are not produced by governmental plan.

Now law and order, on the other hand
The state provides us for the public good;
That's why there's instant justice on demand
And safety in every neighborhood.

David Friedman in The Machinery of Freedom (free full text now available!)

The following quote is from a talk by physicist Richard Feynman called The Relation of Science and Religion, which I consider a apologia of sorts:

I don't know the answer to this central problem – the problem of maintaining the real value of religion, as a source of strength and of courage to most men, while, at the same time, not requiring an absolute faith in the metaphysical aspects.

I feel that's the core of the conflict. Whatever aspects religion has, they are thoroughly dependent on an unquestioning acceptance of some metaphysical model, whether a minimalist one such as in Deism or one as expansive and involved as in Animism. This is the aspect that is antithetical to science, not just in science's conclusions (it's hard to falsify a deistic model, unlikely that will occur any time soon) but fundamentally in its approach.

Operational Transformation (OT) is the theoretical secret juice behind Google Wave. It is the technique that allows concurrent editing that resolves conflicts and prevents the need for edit locks and the like. At its core Google Wave is an extension of the XMPP protocol to support OT, with the sought after invites being for Google's official Wave server and its attendant web client. However, multiple clients and servers are not only possible, but desirable and planned. There's already PyGoWave for those interested. On top of this core there are several other things such as APIs for automated agents and the like. Some people were immediately struck by Google Wave and a few of the demos. However, most people were a bit confused about what it was and in what ways it is superior to e-mail, instant messaging and wikis. It was touted by its creators as a replacement to all of these, and I'm not convinced that is the case. The nature of Google Wave encourages the collaborative creation of prose in a dialectic style, once rather popular but I think a bit neglected these days. It allows the interactivity and most importantly tight coupling with other participants that media such as IRC and Instant Messaging allow but without the strong preference for terse expression. Google Wave, I hope, will lead to a resurrection of dialectical prose.

I'm currently residing in Mountain View, California. I co-founded a startup called HighlightCam, which has been funded by Y Combinator, a seed-funding company that provides extensive counseling and instruction in addition to money. We launched a couple of weeks ago. Working on a startup is clearly what I was meant to do. Been enjoying it immensely. Will post more side-project type stuff when I have time to work on side-projects :)